ARCOM

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 10 results ...

Fahmy, A, Hassan, T, Bassioni, H and McCaffer, R (2019) Dynamic scheduling model for the construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 313–30.

Geekiyanage, D and Ramachandra, T (2020) Nexus between running costs and building characteristics of commercial buildings: hedonic regression modelling. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 389–406.

Ling, F Y, Zhang, Z and Wong, W T (2020) How personality traits influence management styles of construction project managers. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 453–68.

Mathar, H, Assaf, S, Hassanain, M A, Abdallah, A and Sayed, A M (2020) Critical success factors for large building construction projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 349–67.

Mwesigwa, R, Nabwami, R, Mayengo, J and Basulira, G (2020) Contractual completeness as a cornerstone to stakeholder management in public private partnership projects in Uganda. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 469–84.

• Type: Journal Article
• Keywords: Contractual completeness; Contractual obligatoriness; Contingency adaptability; Issue inclusiveness; Term specificity; Stakeholder management; Public private partnership projects; Uganda;
• ISBN/ISSN: 2044-124X
• URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-09-2019-0083
• Abstract:
  The purpose of this study is to examine whether contractual completeness is a cornerstone to stakeholder management in Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects in Uganda. This study adopted a cross-sectional and quantitative approach. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire survey from a sample of 103 PPP projects in Uganda. Partial Least squares structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The study found that contractual completeness dimensions (contractual obligatoriness, contingency adaptability, issue inclusiveness, term specificity) are all significantly and positively associated with stakeholder management in PPP projects in Uganda. This paper is one of the few studies on stakeholder management in PPP projects from a developing country’s perspective, thus contributing to scanty literature on how to manage stakeholders in PPP projects. This paper is limited to the relationship between contract completeness dimensions and stakeholder management in PPP projects in Uganda. Future studies should be conducted on other factors that affect stakeholder management in PPP projects in Uganda. Our results imply that when all the relevant issues are included in the contract, contract terms are explicitly stipulated, all the unanticipated changes are described and when all the parties involved are restrained by a binding force of a contract, conflicts and opportunism reduces and stakeholders concerns are addressed.

Shojaei, P and bolvardizadeh, A (2020) Rough MCDM model for green supplier selection in Iran: a case of university construction project. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 437–52.

Shooshtarian, S, Lingard, H and Wong, P S (2020) Using the cost of construction work to trigger legislative duties for WHS: the Australian experience. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 369–87.

Vilventhan, A and Rajadurai, R (2019) 4D Bridge Information Modelling for management of bridge projects: a case study from India. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 423–35.

Wuni, I Y and Shen, G Q (2020) Stakeholder management in prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction projects: benchmarking the key result areas. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 407–21.

Yap, J B H and Chow, I N (2020) Investigating the managerial ‘‘nuts and bolts’’ for the construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 331–48.